|
PART 6
6. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MANAGEMENT PLAN
6.1 Financing Management Plan Implementation
This section identifies
sources and levels of funding of the projects outlined in the Programme for
Action.
Implementing the proposed actions contained in the Management Plan will
require the significant
levels of funding and
resources. The institutions responsible for management commit resources for the
implementation of the Plan through their individual budgets. The Management
Plan provides the opportunity to introduce greater coordination between
responsible institutions budgeting for the Plan implementation.
The tables below provide the projects, time for their execution, source of
funding and approximate
costs.
The costs of projects given in the tables below are approximate, based on
the expirience from similar projects. The costs of projects will be precisely
defined after tendering procedures. The aim of the exposing approximate costs
is to help responsible institutions to plan the budgets for implementation of
the Plan.
Based on costs essessments the following sources and levels of funding are
defined for the projects that will commence within 18 months (marked as S
-short period) and thouse that are underway (marked with a U):
¾
Government of Republika Srpska: 139.000
EUR
¾
Visegrad Municipality: 137.500 EUR
¾
Commission to Preserve National
Monuments 22.000 EUR
¾
Building owners: 55.000 EUR
The projects with time periods marked as M (medium) to be commenced within
18 months to 5 years, and projects with time period marked as L (long) to be
commenced over 5 years are part of Developing budget. Every year the Bridge
Commission should plan the budget according to the proposed
actions.
The implementation of the Plan will also require additional funds from
external sources. For the actions outlined as medium and long term, the local
sources will not be sufficient and a credit from the international financial
institutions is to be taken.
The following abrevations for sources of funding are used:
CPNM – Commission to
Preserve National Monuments
CoM BiH – Council of
Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina
RSG – Government of
Republika Srpska
VM – Municipality
Visegrad
WIRS - Water Inspection
of Republika Srpska
DWRS – Directorate for
waters of Republika Srpska
EDRS - Electricity
Distribution of Republika Srpska
PCCVM - Public Communal
Company of Višegrad Municipality
HE – hidroelectric power
plant
HMIRS –
Hydro-Meteorological Institute of Republika Srpska
Issue 1: Conservation Management
Objective 1.1
Safeguarding of the
bridge integrity
|
No.
|
Projects
|
Source of
funding
|
Time
|
Costs EUR
| |
1.
|
Monitoring of stability
of structural
elements
|
RSG
|
continuous
|
5.000,00 per year
|
Objective 1.2
Establishment of the
stability and general condition of the Bridge,
Stage 1. Preparation of the
documentation needed for design of the research works project
|
No.
|
Projects
|
Source
|
Time
|
Costs EUR
| |
1.1
|
Collection and detail
analysis of the existing documentation
|
RSG
|
U
|
3.000
| |
1.2
|
Geodesist survey of
current condition
including
|
RSG
|
U
|
2.000
| |
1.3
|
Architectural survey of
current condition including
|
RSG
|
S
|
2.000
| |
1.4
|
Detail record of all
damages (using
drawings made through
survey)
|
RSG
|
S
|
1.000
| |
1.5
|
Collecting data on
speed of the river under each vault
|
RSG
|
S
|
500
| |
|
|
|
|
8.500
|
Stage 2. Research works on materials and condition of the construction
|
No.
|
Projects
|
Source
|
Time
|
Costs EUR
| |
2.1
|
Geological
geomechanical study of types
of materials used on
piers and buttresses:
- test drillings from
roadway to
substrate layer (rock);
- process samples,
- report
|
RSG
|
S
|
20.000,00
| |
2.2
|
Determine condition in
area above arch
extrados:
- excavate test shafts
at previously
agreed positions
- determine strata and
details:
o hydro insulation –
study
condition,
o infill – study
physical and
chemical characteristics
of
the materials,
o inner side of
spandrel
walls – study
condition,
o upper side of stone
arch –
study condition, take
and
test samples, ascertain
possible presence of
metal
cramps
|
RSG
|
S
|
7.000,00
| |
2.3
|
Determine condition of
arch intrados:
- determine possibility
of erecting
temporary scaffolding
in certain
places
- erect scaffolding as
previously agreed
- study condition of
stone blocks and
joints
|
RSG
|
S
|
15.000,00
| |
2.4
|
Determine condition of
base of piers and
foundations of the
structure:
- identify positions
and technical
options for
constructing cofferdams;
the aim being to study
the condition in
at least one pier
position yet to be
repaired and in at
least one pier
position repaired in
1980/81
- issue tender, collect
bids, select
contractor and make
final decision on
places where cofferdams
are to be
built
- carry out cofferdam
works
- determine condition
in enclosed areas
with emphasis on:
o detailed survey of
damage
o taking samples of
materials and testing
to
identify physical,
chemical
and biological
characteristics
o determine condition
of
previously repaired
foundations
o determine condition
of
timber grillage
o investigate existence
of
timber piles
- Additional underwater
survey of
remaining areas
|
RSG
|
S
|
48.000,00
| |
2.5
|
Take samples and test
materials from the Višegradska banja quarry
|
RSG
|
S
|
5.000,00
| |
|
|
|
|
95.000,00
|
Stage 3. Processing of the results from research works
|
No.
|
Projects
|
Source
|
Time
|
Costs EUR
| |
3.1
|
Design of the
hydrological study
|
RSG
|
S
|
3.000
| |
3.2
|
Design of the
preliminary static analyses
|
RSG
|
S
|
4.500
| |
3.3
|
Conclusions and
recommendations
|
RSG
|
S
|
1.000
| |
|
|
|
|
8.500
|
Objective 1.3
Presentation
|
No.
|
Projects
|
Source
|
Time
|
Costs EUR
| |
1.
|
Bridge lighting project
|
RSG
|
M
|
5.000
| |
2.
|
Bridge lighting
|
RSG/external
|
M
|
50.000
| |
|
|
|
|
55.000
|
Issue 2: Management of the environmental impacts on
the Bridge
Issue: 2.1. Floods and the operation of hydroelectric
plants
Objective 2.1.1.
Prevent or Moderate Floods
|
No.
|
Projects
|
Source
|
Time
|
Costs EUR
| |
1.
|
Devise flood prevention
plan
|
|
M
|
| |
2.
|
Work out an early warning
and reporting system
|
|
M
|
| |
3.
|
Devise a flood defence
plan and system of intervention measures with special attention to protecting
the Bridge
|
|
M
|
| |
4.
|
Elaborate a plan of
coordination between civil protection and the hidroelectric power plants
within the flood defence system
|
|
M
|
| |
|
|
|
|
50.000
|
Objective 2.1.2.
Ensure adequate regime of operation of HE Višegrad
|
No.
|
Projects
|
Source
|
Time
|
Costs EUR
| |
1.
|
harmonize the flood
prevention plan with the plans of HE Višegrad
|
RSG
HE-Visegrad
|
M
|
| |
2.
|
harmonize the flood
defence plan and system of urgent measures with the plans of HE Višegrad
|
RSG
HE-Visegrad
|
M
|
| |
3.
|
commit HE Višegrad to
perform
continuous measurements
and report on the amount of water released from the accumulation, especially
in terms of maintaining the ecological minimum
|
RSG
HE-Visegrad
|
M
|
| |
4.
|
commit HE Višegrad to devise
a plan for receiving large quantities of water and a coordination plan for
the release of water from the HE Bajina Bašta storage lake
|
RSG
HE-Visegrad
|
M
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2.000
|
Objective 2.1.3.
Ensure that the Public Electricity Distribution Company of Republika
Srpska performs its
obligations as per the
construction licence
|
No.
|
Projects
|
Source
|
Time
|
Costs EUR
| |
1.
|
Regulate the Drina
riverbed downstream from the dam to the Mehmed Pasha Sokolovic Bridge
|
RSG
HE-Visegrad
|
M
|
1.000.000
| |
2.
|
Repair the Bridge piers
in accordance with the requirements of the construction licence. Results from
the research works on the state of the Bridge will inform future management.
Approximate figures will result from the Design
|
RSG
HE-Visegrad
|
M/L
|
2.500.000
| |
|
|
|
|
3.500.000
|
Objective 2.1.4.
Prevent negative effects of the HE Bajina Bašta accumulation
|
No.
|
Projects
|
Source
|
Time
|
Costs EUR
| |
1.
|
Bilateral agreement
that will regulate the reduction of the level of storage water in Bajina
Bašta to the planned level
|
CoM BIH,
Government
of Serbia and
Montenegro
|
S
|
| |
2.
|
Devise a plan of
repairing the banks of the storage lake when the water levels of Bajina Bašta
are reduced to the planned level
|
CoM BIH,
Government
of Serbia and
Montenegro
|
M
|
| |
3.
|
Devise a plan to repair
the banks of the Drina downstream from the Bridge after reducing the water
level in the storage lake
|
CoM BIH,
Government
of Serbia and
Montenegro
|
M
|
| |
|
|
|
|
10.000
|
Issue: 2.2. Prevention of potential negative
environmental impacts on the Bridge
Objective 2.2.5.
Prevent grass and weeds growing in the cracks and between the stone blocks
of the Bridge
|
No.
|
Projects
|
Source
|
Time
|
Costs EUR
| |
1.
|
Devise a plan of
clearing grass and weeds from the Bridge
|
RSG
|
S
|
| |
2.
|
Determine the best way
to remove grass and weeds with the least possible use of chemical agents
(herbicides)
|
RSG
|
S
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2.000
|
Objective 2.2.6.
Set up a waste management
system
|
No.
|
Projects
|
Source
|
Time
|
Costs EUR
| |
1.
|
Devise a plan of
collection and disposal of waste
|
VM
|
M
|
| |
2.
|
Develop a system of
selective waste collection
|
VM
|
M
|
| |
3.
|
Technically enable the
public communal company
|
VM
|
M
|
| |
4.
|
Increase the number of
cleaning staff
|
VM
|
M
|
| |
5.
|
Intensify control by
establishing an ecopolice force and by making inspection bodies more
efficient
|
VM
|
M
|
| |
6.
|
Acquire and set up
litter bins
|
VM
|
S
|
5.000
|
Objective 2.2.7.
Reduce the negative
effect of snow and ice on the us age and maintenance of the Bridge
|
No.
|
Projects
|
Source
|
Time
|
Costs EUR
| |
1.
|
Provide winter maintenance
services with equipment and material resources for maintenance of the Bridge
|
VM
|
S
|
| |
2.
|
Make the Bridge
maintenance a priority
with the public
communal company
|
VM
|
S
|
| |
3.
|
Educate staff on the
specific nature and importance of regular maintenance of the Bridge and its
protection zone
|
VM
|
S
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2.000
|
Objective 2.2.8.
Retain the quality of
water of the Drina in Višegrad and prevent jeopardizing current quality
|
No.
|
Projects
|
Source
|
Time
|
Costs EUR
| |
1.
|
Connect all water flows
into a sewage system
|
VM
|
L
|
| |
2.
|
Direct all sewage lines
from the inner
town centre to the
common collector
|
VM
|
L
|
| |
3.
|
Prevent direct release
of industrial waste waters into the river Drina
|
VM
|
L
|
| |
4.
|
Construct a city waste
water treatment plant
|
VM
|
L
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2.500.000
|
Objective 2.2.9.
Prevent jeopardizing the air quality at the Bridge micro-location and
within the Bridge
Protection Zone
|
No.
|
Projects
|
Source
|
Time
|
Costs EUR
| |
1.
|
Plan the construction
of a thermal power plant and connection the buildings to the unique heating
system
|
RSG
VM
|
L
|
| |
2.
|
Prevent the
construction of industrial
facilities in the
vicinity of the Bridge and locations from which pollution could spread to the
Bridge
|
RSG
VM
|
L
|
|
Objective 2.2.10.
Follow environmental quality standards when rehabilitating old industrial
facilities and
building new ones
|
No.
|
Projects
|
Source
|
Time
|
Costs EUR
| |
1.
|
Plan industrial
development with "clean production"
|
RSG
VM
investors
|
L
|
| |
2.
|
Apply the best
available technologies
(BAT) when planning the
revitalisation of existing facilities and the construction of new ones
|
RSG
VM
investors
|
L
|
| |
3.
|
Organise regular
monitoring and reporting by operators of facilities and plants
|
RSG
VM
investors
|
L
|
| |
4.
|
Educate interested
parties in
environmental
protection and legal
regulations for
environmental protection
|
RSG
VM
investors
|
L
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2.500.000
|
Objective 2. 2.11
Plan special protection measures in case of infrastructure works in the
Bridge Protection
Zone
|
No.
|
Projects
|
Source
|
Time
|
Costs EUR
| |
1.
|
Devise a Bridge
protection plan when
constructing
infrastructure
|
RSG
VM
investors
|
L
|
| |
2.
|
Plan material and
technical resources with least risk for the Bridge Protection Zone and the
environment
|
RSG
VM
investors
|
L
|
| |
3.
|
Devise a plan to repair
damages in the Protection Zone and to restore it to its original state
|
RSG
VM
investors
|
L
|
| |
4.
|
Educate staff on
protection measures prior to construction works
|
RSG
VM
investors
|
L
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2.000
|
NASTAVAK - FOLLOW- UP
|
